If you want to fight the NWO you need to be pure. There is no other way.
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlS_JtGncDI
If you want to fight the NWO you need to be pure. There is no other way.
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlS_JtGncDI
The religionist’s life-blood lies in being the arbiter of what is and is not ‘allowed’. If people followed what the Quran says is forbidden, he would be out of a job…
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gVHmB6gB8k
Man has a contract with God. It is repeated 10 trillion times a year, yet rarely understood.
Traditionalists either choose to be silent about – or, more likely, are simply ignorant of – the fact that al fātiḥah is a contract which mirrors to a striking extent the conventions of the ancient Hittite suzerainty treaty.
Such treaties, under which vassals and lords came to terms, fell into the following sections: preamble where both the contract owner and vassal are identified, (here: 1:1, and 1:5), prologue which listed deeds done by the suzerain for the vassal (here: God’s universal credentials at 1:2-4), stipulations (terms to be upheld for the life of the treaty by the vassal and the lord (here: 1:5 and 1:6-7), provision for regular public (here: sūrah al fātiḥah is read multiple times daily by longstanding convention and given its position at the head of the Qur’anic text is a natural prelude to reading any of the rest of it), and divine witness to the treaty (which in this context is implicit). Finally, blessings on those who upheld the treaty and curses upon those who failed to do so (here: 2:2-5 and 2:6-21) were evoked after the contract proper.
The opening statement of al baqarah (2:2) reads: That is al kitābu lā rayba fīhi. By use of this demonstrative pronoun the text identifies that which precedes (al fātiḥah) as al kitābu lā rayba fīhi.
The Qur’an states at 10:37 that the Qur’an itself serves two purposes: to confirm what is within its scope, and to give a detailed exposition of al kitābu lā rayba fīhi.
Since the meaning of kitāb in the collocation al kitābu lā rayba fīhi relates to treaty or covenant – both acceptable senses of kitāb – I have rendered this phrase in all three instances: the covenant about which there is no doubt.
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQ220xGKjBQ
The evidence is that Muhammad came from – or was connected with – Petra. Mecca appears on no map until 300 years after the revelation.
This is a follow up to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uUTV8ojTkdE
I recommend those who are interested in facts rather than hearsay and assumption inherited from fathers who themselves did not question to read Dan Gibson’s book Qur’ānic Geography.
You can find Gibson’s site at: searchformecca.com
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inJ1mCIsz5A
The Traditionalist can find no real support for the tenets of his religion in the Qur’an. His religion comes from an entirely different source.
I recommend those who are interested in facts rather than hearsay and assumption inherited from fathers who themselves did not question to read Dan Gibson’s book Qur’ānic Geography.
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uUTV8ojTkdE
Traditionalist Islam and democracy have a lot in common. You need to be able to practice Doublethink to believe in either.
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxuZ3DhV13k
I take a lot of flak on this one, but I have done my homework.
For a quick introduction, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmFTgeK7U6U
I also recommend: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5i_iDyUTCg
I then refer you to: http://bit.ly/1OGfioT (see books below also).
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZP8QfiE9sxo
Many assume that the hijab is in the Qur’an – or, more specifically, many assume that what is thought of today as female Islamic dress is required by the Qur’an.
In this post I clarify what the Qur’an itself says on this disproportionately emotive subject.
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhu6fbXHEIk
The name for God in the English language is God. By using ‘allah’ the Traditionalist injects a cultural value into this word which is not there in the Arabic and should not be there in the English. The word ‘allah’ is not the name of a particular god in Arabic. It is the name: God. It is what Arab Christians call God.
The word allah means God. It is the word used in Arabic Bibles. Calling God by another name in English makes him into some sort of ‘Arabic’ deity – which is inappropriate and wrong. The word for God in English is God.
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3H_e2mBPFQ
People who are not intergenerational psychopaths have a hard time understanding those who are.
The ruling elite believes it has a right to rule the rest of us.
More than that. It believes it has an obligation to do so.
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuisW7rSU98